[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#534430: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26: CBQ broken)

Your message dated Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:54:47 +0100
with message-id <20100131125447.GA2700@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#534430: Info received (linux-image-2.6.26: CBQ broken)
has caused the Debian Bug report #534430,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26: CBQ broken
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

534430: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534430
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.26
Version: nfsfix.1
Severity: normal

CBQ is completely broken. The borrowed counters never increase and from there on the  bandwidth computation is totally fubar.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26 depends on:
ii  coreutils                     6.10-6     The GNU core utilities
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.24     Debian configuration management sy

linux-image-2.6.26 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26 suggests:
ii  fdutils                   5.5-20060227-3 Linux floppy utilities
pn  ksymoops                  <none>         (no description available)
pn  linux-doc-2.6.26 | linux- <none>         (no description available)

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:44:37PM +0000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 13:12 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:38:07AM +0000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > > Sorry, ignore my previous email. 
> > > 
> > > I think I got to it, for whatever reason it is not getting set in
> > > cbq_set_lss(), just can't figure out what is wrong.
> > 
> > Anton, 
> > as per your posting on linux-netdev I understand this bug can be closed?
> Yes. 
> It is "bad english" in the output of tc combined with "bad timing" since
> kernel has gone to high perf timers. 2.6.9 and even 2.6.18 delivered
> considerably better traffic shaping performance.

Ok, closing, then.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: