[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#508923: Bug#508527: 2.6.26-11 oops on initial NIC (via-velocity) setup



On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:38:21PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 14:05 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:53:43AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > There is a pending stable update to Debian 5.0 "lenny" that may
> > > fix this issue.  Please test it.  You will need to add the
> > > stable-proposed-updates suite to your APT sources, e.g. add this
> > > line to /etc/apt/sources.list:
> > > 
> > >     deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian lenny-proposed-updates main
> > > 
> > > Then run:
> > > 
> > >     apt-get update
> > >     apt-get install linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64=2.6.26-21
> > 
> > Hello Ben, I am the submitter of 508923.
> > I have installed the 32bit kernel on my VIA C7 (VIA C7 does not do 64bit)
> > (linux-image-2.6.26-2-i686=2.6.26-21) and it does not fix this issue,
> > the kernel crashes in the same way. The changelog does not mention any
> > fix to via-velocity though.
> 
> I'm sorry, my previous message was sent in error.  The potential fix for
> via-velocity was added after 2.6.26-21.  If you are willing to rebuild
> the kernel, please check out
> <svn://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/dists/lenny/linux-2.6/> and follow the
> instructions at
> <http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official> (aside from running apt-get source!).

This one works fine, great! (using SVN rev 14940 on i686).
However the instruction to build from the SVN could be improved.
I end up doing:

mkdir linux; cd linux
mkdir orig; cd orig; apt-get source linux-image-2.6.26-2-686; cd ..
svn co 'svn://svn.debian.org/kernel/dists/lenny/linux-2.6/'
cd linux-2.6
make -f debian/rules orig
make -f debian/rules debian/control-real
fakeroot debian/rules debian/build debian/stamps
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_i386_none_686

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



Reply to: