notfound 536148 2.6.30-1 thanks On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:10:49 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote: [...] > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:11:38PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote: > > According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-1758 is fixed in > > testing, but not in unstable. > > Please show that this problem is applicable to the unpatched kernel. As I said in the report, I personally tried to understand whether CVE-2009-1758 is already fixed in linux-2.6/2.6.30-1, but I was not able to determine that by myself. That's why I asked the experts (you!). Similarly to bug #536147, I wanted to get confirmation that everything is fine (and get the security tracker updated) or otherwise make sure no regression is introduced in testing. This bug has been closed in the meanwhile. I am glad I got confirmation that linux-2.6/2.6.30-1 is fixed. Again, thanks to all the people involved in dealing with this bug report! Have a nice day! -- New location for my website! Update your bookmarks! http://www.inventati.org/frx ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpihvfc4N3co.pgp
Description: PGP signature