Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable

To: "Francesco Poli (t1000)" <frx@firenze.linux.it>, 536148@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:10:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090707231049.GB26615@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
Reply-to: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, 536148@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090707211138.5934.4689.reportbug@homebrew>
References: <[🔎] 20090707211138.5934.4689.reportbug@homebrew>

severity 536148 important
tags 536148 moreinfo
thanks

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:11:38PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-1758 is fixed in
> testing, but not in unstable.

Please show that this problem is applicable to the unpatched kernel.

Bastian

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>

References:
- Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable
  - From: "Francesco Poli \(t1000\)" <frx@firenze.linux.it>

Prev by Date: Processed: tagging 535130
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable
Previous by thread: Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread