Bug#526609: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 not in unstable?)
Your message dated Sat, 2 May 2009 13:03:37 +0200
with message-id <20090502110337.GA21553@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#526609: linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 not in unstable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #526609,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 not in unstable?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
526609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-15
Very simple, really: testing and stable have 2.6.26-2 (which includes NFS
support from within a VE). unstable doesn't appear to have that package
(although apt-cache reports that some things reference it).
Is this just an oversight?
--
jan grant, ISYS, University of Bristol. http://www.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44 (0)117 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/
OORDBMSs make me feel old; I remember when this was all fields.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 08:58:32AM +0100, jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
> Is this just an oversight?
No bug. This package only exists in stable and maybe testing.
Bastian
--
"Life and death are seldom logical."
"But attaining a desired goal always is."
-- McCoy and Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2821.7
--- End Message ---
Reply to: