Bug#526609: linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 not in unstable?

To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#526609: linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 not in unstable?
From: jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 08:58:32 +0100 (BST)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.BSF.2.00.0905020856460.62193@tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
Reply-to: jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk, 526609@bugs.debian.org

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-15

Very simple, really: testing and stable have 2.6.26-2 (which includes NFS 
support from within a VE). unstable doesn't appear to have that package 
(although apt-cache reports that some things reference it).

Is this just an oversight?



-- 
jan grant, ISYS, University of Bristol. http://www.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44 (0)117 3317661   http://ioctl.org/jan/
OORDBMSs make me feel old; I remember when this was all fields.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#526609: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 not in unstable?)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Bug#526551: Further information
Next by Date: Bug#526609: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 not in unstable?)
Previous by thread: Bug#526551: Further information
Next by thread: Bug#526609: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 not in unstable?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread