[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#559069: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:26:21 -0700
with message-id <20091202062621.GC21851@lackof.org>
and subject line fixed in 2.6.28-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #559069,
regarding linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

559069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559069
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
Severity: minor


A newcommer to Debian, forgive me if I do any mistakes, I'm trying to
compile broadcom-sta following http://wiki.debian.org/wl wiki page.
While installing linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64, I noticed that it depends on
gcc-4.1, but when I installed 'gcc' package, aptitude installed 'gcc-4.3'.

Is gcc-4.1 desperately needed for this package? can't we change the dependency
to accept >= gcc-4.1?

Mohan R.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.28-1

--- End Message ---

Reply to: