[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Debian Kernel Group Meeting



On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 10:29 -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
[...]
> Too bad you couldn't get a directory on a Linux Kernel Organization 
> server, like here
> 
>      http://www.kernel.org/pub/dist/
> 
> or here
> 
>      http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/
> 
> Seems like Debian Kernel Team activities are exactly the sort of thing 
> that belongs on kernel.org servers anyway.  Just a thought...

Well the archive is kind of the easy bit; we also need auto-builders.

> PS:  I did not receive your reply in my inbox, but found it browsing the 
> debian-kernel ML archive (lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2009/10/).  It 
> was not spam-blocked by my ISP (AT&T/Yahoo), so I don't know where it 
> went.  Occasionally, I have had replies from maintainers sent via the 
> BTS disappear on me as well.  Bummer.

Your ISP refused the message:

2009-10-16 16:02:13 1MyoJl-0003c3-HE ** dawitbro@sbcglobal.net R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from remote mail server after MAIL FROM:<ben@decadent.org.uk>: host sbcmx4.prodigy.net [207.115.20.23]: 553 5.3.0 flpd115 - n9GF2CM2004967, DNSBL:ATTRBL 521< 88.96.1.126 >_is_blocked.__For_information_see_http://att.net/blocks

My mail server does not send spam and has the static address 88.96.1.126
which has a valid reverse-DNS record.  There is no reason for it to be
on a block-list other than some administrator assuming all mail servers
must be run by an ISP.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: