[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#499957: marked as done (linux-modules-contrib-2.6: please re-enable em8300)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:27:35 +0100
with message-id <1255483655.2488.115.camel@localhost>
and subject line Re: linux-modules-contrib-2.6: please re-enable em8300
has caused the Debian Bug report #499957,
regarding linux-modules-contrib-2.6: please re-enable em8300
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
499957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-modules-contrib-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

Compatibility of em8300 with linux 2.6.26 was fixed in version 0.16.4-4; 
please re-enable those modules in linux-modules-contrib-2.6.


Cheers,

Nicolas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (800, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-irma
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
linux-modules-contrib-2.6 has been removed and will not come back.  The
most serious problem with this package is described in bug #517130.  You
can make your module-source packages build modules automatically by
integrating them with dkms.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply to: