notfound 536147 2.6.30-1 thanks On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:05:03 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:00:31PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote: > > According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-0029 is fixed in > > testing, but not in unstable. > > The security tracker is _no_ authorative source. This is fixed since > some time. I am well aware that the security tracker is _not_ the ultimate and infallible source of information about Debian security. My goal is to do what I can to improve its reliability and consistency with other sources. My intent in filing this bug report was two-fold: (a) if the tracker was right, I wanted to prevent the migration of a vulnerable linux-2.6 that would have introduced a regression into testing (b) if the tracker was wrong, I wanted to get confirmation that linux-2.6/2.6.30-1 is already fixed (since I was not able to verify that by myself, despite having tried), so that the tracker could be updated I am glad to see that we were in case (b)! ;-) Thanks to all the people involved in dealing with this bug report for confirming that linux-2.6/2.6.30-1 is OK. Have a nice day! -- New location for my website! Update your bookmarks! http://www.inventati.org/frx ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp0LXrCAhTnA.pgp
Description: PGP signature