Bug#536147: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-0029 fixed in testing, but not unstable

To: "Francesco Poli (t1000)" <frx@firenze.linux.it>, 536147@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#536147: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-0029 fixed in testing, but not unstable
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:05:03 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090707230503.GA26615@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
Reply-to: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, 536147@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090707210031.5726.48920.reportbug@homebrew>
References: <[🔎] 20090707210031.5726.48920.reportbug@homebrew>

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:00:31PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-0029 is fixed in
> testing, but not in unstable.

The security tracker is _no_ authorative source. This is fixed since
some time.

Bastian

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#536147: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-0029 fixed in testing, but not unstable
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>

References:
- Bug#536147: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-0029 fixed in testing, but not unstable
  - From: "Francesco Poli \(t1000\)" <frx@firenze.linux.it>

Prev by Date: Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.30-2_powerpc.changes
Next by Date: Bug#369303: marked as done ([powerpc] On oldworld macintosh need fbcon compiled in)
Previous by thread: Bug#536147: marked as done (linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-0029 fixed in testing, but not unstable)
Next by thread: Bug#536147: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-0029 fixed in testing, but not unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread