Bug#509237: marked as done (purge: /var/lib/initramfs-tools' not empty so not removed)
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:48:29 +0100
with message-id <20081221194829.GL8692@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#509237: /var/lib/initramfs-tools
has caused the Debian Bug report #509237,
regarding purge: /var/lib/initramfs-tools' not empty so not removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
509237: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509237
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92j
Severity: normal
Not sure if I had 0.92j. As you can see, I have already purged it.
Removing initramfs-tools ...
Purging configuration files for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg - warning: while removing initramfs-tools, directory `/var/lib/initramfs-tools' not empty so not removed.
Indeed, /var/lib/initramfs-tools is not empty. Wasn't initramfs-tools
the one who wrote to that dir in the first place?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:49:50PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> (background, Manoj asked for opinions on #debian)
>
> I think I agree that the stuff under /var/lib/initramfs-tools is
> internal state specific to initramfs-tools and should be purged by
> initramfs-tools. (as distinct from the initrd itself, which is what the
> user/linux-image/kernel-package asked to be created). Since it can
> be reproduced without kernel-package (using debian images or make; make
> install) it's definitely not filed against the right package atm. I'd
> have expected downgrading to minor and reassigning it back to
> initramfs-tools, but I'll leave that to the maintainers to sort out.
no it is not replicable with official linux-images,
that bug there got fixed long ago.
i don't care to bounce that to k-p.
--
maks
--- End Message ---
Reply to: