[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#375283: marked as done (linux-2.6.16: descriptions for linux-modules packages missing important information)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:27:15 +0100
with message-id <20081221102715.GA6216@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-2.6.16: descriptions for linux-modules packages missing important information
has caused the Debian Bug report #375283,
regarding linux-2.6.16: descriptions for linux-modules packages missing important information
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
375283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=375283
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-2.6.16
Version: 2.6.16-15
Severity: normal

Descriptions for binary packages linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686,
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-k7 and
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 are missing important
information.
There is obviously something wrong since
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 and
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686 have identical descriptions. Also, I
don't have a clue about the rationale for these packages, but in
general, the descriptions do not give a clue what is the difference
between the modules included in, for example,
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686, and those in, in this example, linux-image-2.6.16-2-686.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 06:23:26PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6.16
> Version: 2.6.16-15
> Severity: normal
> 
> Descriptions for binary packages linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686,
> linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-k7 and
> linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 are missing important
> information.
> There is obviously something wrong since
> linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 and
> linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686 have identical descriptions. Also, I
> don't have a clue about the rationale for these packages, but in
> general, the descriptions do not give a clue what is the difference
> between the modules included in, for example,
> linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686, and those in, in this example, linux-image-2.6.16-2-686.

The descriptions in the Lenny seem fine. If you're missing specific information,
please mention is specifically.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: