Re: Removal request: madwifi, madwifi-tools
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 05:35:35PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> * a free driver (in fact 2, but only one present in Linux 2.6.26) exists
> and works out of the box -> ath5k
Can you propose a backported ath9k patch to the kernel people?
> * operation modes that may make madwifi more desirable than ath5k are currently
> broken (#491731)
What's the state of ANI in ath5k? bugs #463729, #493832 seem to come
from the lack of ANI in ath5k.
> * I lack the motivation to improve any of the points listed above, except for
> the very first one, and I am the primary caretaker of the madwifi Debian
> package and have always been so
Will you still be around to fix issues in ath5k/ath9k? Both of them
still need some work to be done. But I certainly agree that going for
them is better idea than maintaining a dead-end closed source driver.
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Reply to: