[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#498472: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686: does not boot under Etch Xen)



Your message dated Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:44:27 +0100
with message-id <1221241467.19471.55.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#498472: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686: does not boot under Etch Xen
has caused the Debian Bug report #498472,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686: does not boot under Etch Xen
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
498472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686
Version: 2.6.26-4
Severity: normal

Hi,

I know an Etch host with its stock Xen 3.0.3 hypervisor may be of no
interest, but I hope it still is.  After all, a while ago I tested 
linux-image-2.6.26-rc8-xen-686_2.6.26~rc8-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11752_i386.deb
and that booted OK with the same config on the same system.

Unfortunately, I can't find any more such images under
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/, so I can't tell
which snapshot was the last workable version.  From that pool,
2.6.25-7snapshot.11833 works, 2.6.27~rc5-1~experimental.1~snapshot.12183
crashes very much the same.

Here is the config:

name = "sandbox.aai"
kernel = "/home/wferi/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-xen-686"
ramdisk = "/home/wferi/initrd.img-2.6.26-1-xen-686"
memory = 300
vif = [ 'mac=00:16:3e:01:00:31, bridge=br894' ]
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/mapper/sandbox.aai,xvda,w' ]
root = "/dev/mapper/sandbox-root ro"
extra = "2"
on_poweroff = 'destroy'
on_reboot   = 'restart'
on_crash    = 'restart'

And the full console output:

[    0.000000] Reserving virtual address space above 0xf57fe000
[    0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
[    0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
[    0.000000] Linux version 2.6.26-1-xen-686 (Debian 2.6.26-4) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23)) #1 SMP Thu Aug 28 16:22:33 UTC 2008
[    0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[    0.000000]  Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f000 (usable)
[    0.000000]  Xen: 0000000000100000 - 0000000012c00000 (usable)
[    0.000000] 0MB HIGHMEM available.
[    0.000000] 300MB LOWMEM available.
[    0.000000] Zone PFN ranges:
[    0.000000]   DMA             0 ->     4096
[    0.000000]   Normal       4096 ->    76800
[    0.000000]   HighMem     76800 ->    76800
[    0.000000] Movable zone start PFN for each node
[    0.000000] early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
[    0.000000]     0:        0 ->    76800
[    0.000000] DMI not present or invalid.
[    0.000000] Allocating PCI resources starting at 20000000 (gap: 12c00000:ed400000)
[    0.000000] SMP: Allowing 0 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
[    0.000000] PERCPU: Allocating 42056 bytes of per cpu data
[    0.000000] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 76200
[    0.000000] Kernel command line:  root=/dev/mapper/sandbox-root ro 2
[    0.000000] Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- you can enable it with "lapic"
[    0.000000] Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
[    0.000000] Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
[    0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
[    0.000000] PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes)
[    0.000000] Detected 2392.232 MHz processor.
[    0.004000] Console: colour dummy device 80x25
[    0.004000] console [tty0] enabled
[    0.004000] console [hvc0] enabled
[    0.004000] Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
[    0.004000] Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
[    0.004000] Memory: 292528k/307200k available (1603k kernel code, 14192k reserved, 635k data, 208k init, 0k highmem)
[    0.004000] virtual kernel memory layout:
[    0.004000]     fixmap  : 0xf5617000 - 0xf57fd000   (1944 kB)
[    0.004000]     pkmap   : 0xf5200000 - 0xf5400000   (2048 kB)
[    0.004000]     vmalloc : 0xd3800000 - 0xf51fe000   ( 537 MB)
[    0.004000]     lowmem  : 0xc0000000 - 0xd2c00000   ( 300 MB)
[    0.004000]       .init : 0xc0337000 - 0xc036b000   ( 208 kB)
[    0.004000]       .data : 0xc0290d03 - 0xc032fa80   ( 635 kB)
[    0.004000]       .text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc0290d03   (1603 kB)
[    0.004000] Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok.
[    0.004000] installing Xen timer for CPU 0
[    0.080011] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 3831.81 BogoMIPS (lpj=7663624)
[    0.080090] Security Framework initialized
[    0.080108] SELinux:  Disabled at boot.
[    0.080122] Capability LSM initialized
[    0.080154] Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
[    0.080354] Initializing cgroup subsys ns
[    0.080375] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
[    0.080388] Initializing cgroup subsys devices
[    0.080437] CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K
[    0.080457] CPU: L2 cache: 512K
[    0.080468] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 3
[    0.080483] Intel machine check architecture supported.
[    0.080506] Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
[    0.080522] CPU0: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (12) available
[    0.080567] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP 
[    0.080587] Modules linked in:
[    0.080598] 
[    0.080607] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.26-1-xen-686 #1)
[    0.080625] EIP: e019:[<c010245b>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0
[    0.080644] EIP is at xen_write_cr4+0x2/0x6
[    0.080657] EAX: 00000620 EBX: 00000020 ECX: c0331f3f EDX: 00000036
[    0.080673] ESI: c0331fe4 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: c0331fc8
[    0.080690]  DS: e021 ES: e021 FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: e021
[    0.080706] Process swapper (pid: 0, ti=c0330000 task=c0307300 task.ti=c0330000)
[    0.080725] Stack: c033f4e5 c033eaf7 c033784b c03527a0 003d0000 c033c882 00000000 9fab8171 
[    0.080762]        00004400 0702080b 00000f27 f5800000 00000000 c0b70000 
[    0.080792] Call Trace:
[    0.080803]  [<c033f4e5>] stop_mce+0x21/0x22
[    0.080819]  [<c033eaf7>] alternative_instructions+0xa/0x106
[    0.080841]  [<c033784b>] start_kernel+0x2bc/0x2c4
[    0.080856]  [<c033c882>] xen_start_kernel+0x276/0x27c
[    0.080874]  =======================
[    0.080883] Code: 01 59 89 f0 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 c3 31 c0 c3 64 8b 15 08 20 36 c0 89 42 08 c3 64 a1 08 20 36 c0 8b 40 08 c3 64 a1 28 20 36 c0 c3 24 6f <0f> 22 e0 c3 64 a1 0c 20 36 c0 c3 64 a3 10 20 36 c0 c3 53 bb 02 
[    0.081059] EIP: [<c010245b>] xen_write_cr4+0x2/0x6 SS:ESP e021:c0331fc8
[    0.081094] ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
[    0.081108] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!

Thanks,
Feri.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (600, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 19:31 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> 
> I upgraded to the 3.2 hypervisor from Backports.org, and that indeed
> works perfectly.  You can close this bug.

Have done with this email. thanks.

> Special thanks (to the team) for the suspend and the D-I support!
> 
> I seem to recall that I read somewhere a description of Xen support in
> Lenny.  It stated the lack of dom0 support, and suggested to stay with
> Etch in the dom0s.  If there'll be a Xen section in Lenny release
> notes, we'd rather make sure to point out that this is *not* possible.

Yes, I think it's been badly worded in the past (by me if no one
else...). What is suggested is to run Lenny (incl hypervisor etc) but
with the Etch domain 0 kernel.

Ian.
-- 
Ian Campbell

The surest protection against temptation is cowardice.
		-- Mark Twain



--- End Message ---

Reply to: