[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#414932: linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx: xfs partition from x86 system can not be used on arm



Eric,

Do you know what the status is of your XFS patch to make it work on
ARM (old ABI)?

* Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> [2008-03-17 09:50]:
> A patch for this problem has been posted now.
> 
> Message-ID: <47DB4181.7040603@sandeen.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:24:49 -0500
> From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
> CC: patches@arm.linux.org.uk
> Subject: [PATCH] fix dir2 shortform structures on ARM old ABI
> 
> This should fix the longstanding issues with xfs and old ABI
> arm boxes, which lead to various asserts and xfs shutdowns,
> and for which an (incorrect) patch has been floating around
> for years.  (Said patch made ARM internally consistent, but
> altered the normal xfs on-disk format such that it looked
> corrupted on other architectures):
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20040311.002034.5ecf21a2.html
> 
> Old ABI ARM has interesting packing & padding; for example
> on ARM old abi:
> 
> struct xfs_dir2_sf_entry {
> 	__uint8_t                  namelen;      /*     0     1 */
> 
> 	/* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */
> 
> 	xfs_dir2_sf_off_t          offset;       /*     4     4 */
> 	__uint8_t                  name[1];      /*     8     1 */
> 
> 	/* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */
> 
> 	xfs_dir2_inou_t            inumber;      /*    12     8 */
> 
> 	/* size: 20, cachelines: 1 */
> 	/* sum members: 14, holes: 2, sum holes: 6 */
> 	/* last cacheline: 20 bytes */
> };
> 
> but on x86:
> 
> struct xfs_dir2_sf_entry {
> 	__uint8_t                  namelen;      /*     0     1 */
> 	xfs_dir2_sf_off_t          offset;       /*     1     2 */
> 	__uint8_t                  name[1];      /*     3     1 */
> 	xfs_dir2_inou_t            inumber;      /*     4     8 */
> 
> 	/* size: 12, cachelines: 1 */
> 	/* last cacheline: 12 bytes */
> };
> 
> ... this sort of discrepancy leads to problems.
> 
> I've verified this patch by comparing the on-disk structure 
> layouts using pahole from the dwarves package, as well as 
> running through a bit of xfsqa under qemu-arm, modified so 
> that the check/repair phase after each test actually executes 
> check/repair from the x86 host, on the filesystem populated 
> by the arm emulator.  Thus far it all looks good.
> 
> There are 2 other structures with extra padding at the end, 
> but they don't seem to cause trouble.  I suppose they could 
> be packed as well: xfs_dir2_data_unused_t and xfs_dir2_sf_t.
> 
> Note that userspace needs a similar treatment, and any
> filesystems which were running with the previous rogue
> "fix" will now see corruption (either in the kernel, or
> during xfs_repair) with this fix properly in place; it 
> may be worth teaching xfs_repair to identify and fix that 
> specific issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> 
> ---
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h
> +++ linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h
> @@ -300,4 +300,11 @@ static inline __uint64_t howmany_64(__ui
>  	return x;
>  }
>  
> +/* ARM old ABI has some weird alignment/padding */
> +#if defined(__arm__) && !defined(__ARM_EABI__)
> +#define __arch_pack __attribute__((packed))
> +#else
> +#define __arch_pack
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* __XFS_LINUX__ */
> Index: linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.h
> +++ linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.h
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ typedef union {
>   * Normalized offset (in a data block) of the entry, really xfs_dir2_data_off_t.
>   * Only need 16 bits, this is the byte offset into the single block form.
>   */
> -typedef struct { __uint8_t i[2]; } xfs_dir2_sf_off_t;
> +typedef struct { __uint8_t i[2]; } __arch_pack xfs_dir2_sf_off_t;
>  
>  /*
>   * The parent directory has a dedicated field, and the self-pointer must
> @@ -76,14 +76,14 @@ typedef struct xfs_dir2_sf_hdr {
>  	__uint8_t		count;		/* count of entries */
>  	__uint8_t		i8count;	/* count of 8-byte inode #s */
>  	xfs_dir2_inou_t		parent;		/* parent dir inode number */
> -} xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t;
> +} __arch_pack xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t;
>  
>  typedef struct xfs_dir2_sf_entry {
>  	__uint8_t		namelen;	/* actual name length */
>  	xfs_dir2_sf_off_t	offset;		/* saved offset */
>  	__uint8_t		name[1];	/* name, variable size */
>  	xfs_dir2_inou_t		inumber;	/* inode number, var. offset */
> -} xfs_dir2_sf_entry_t;
> +} __arch_pack xfs_dir2_sf_entry_t; 
>  
>  typedef struct xfs_dir2_sf {
>  	xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t	hdr;		/* shortform header */
> 
> -- 
> Martin Michlmayr
> http://www.cyrius.com/
> 

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



Reply to: