[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#486171: marked as done (Kernel 2.6.22-3-amd64 doesn't recognize Samsung Laser printer ML-2010R)



Your message dated Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:14:56 +0200
with message-id <20080614121456.GJ7212@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#486171: Kernel 2.6.22-3-amd64 doesn't recognize Samsung Laser printer ML-2010R
has caused the Debian Bug report #486171,
regarding Kernel 2.6.22-3-amd64 doesn't recognize Samsung Laser printer ML-2010R
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
486171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=486171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-amd64
Version: 2.6.22-6.lenny1

With kernel 2.6.22-3-amd64, lsusb/lpinfo -v doesn't view Samsung Laser printer ML-2010R when connected on USB port

This printer is recognized with some other kernel versions.

I am using Debian GNU/Linux Lenny  and libc6 2.7-10







--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.24-1

[ thanks for keeping bug report on cc for the next time,
  not private communication could be easily lost in spam!? ]

On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:32:09AM +0200, Bluenote wrote:
> maximilian attems a écrit :
> >On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 01:26:16AM +0200, Bluenote wrote:
> >  
> >>Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-amd64
> >>Version: 2.6.22-6.lenny1
> >>    
> >
> >hmmm you are quite outdate please upgrade to latest available.
> >  
> no pb with 2.6.24 or 2.6.18
> it's why i reported a bug for 2.6.22-3 only

2.6.22 is no longer in the archive, thus closing.

> >aka at least 2.6.24
> >  
> But for Etch ??

etch never released with 2.6.22 so no trouble there
if you want newer there, checkout etch + half 
-> http://wiki.debian.org/EtchAndAHalf

sunny greetings

-- 
maks


--- End Message ---

Reply to: