[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#482964: boot freezes with kernel 2.6.24-1-686



[ please keep bug report on cc, thanks! ]

On Mon, 26 May 2008, Louis-Maurice De Sousa wrote:
>    > can you please try 2.6.25 from sid installs just fine in testing.
>    Done.
>    *****************************
>    orval:~# aptitude show linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
>    Paquet : linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
>    Nouveau: oui
>    Etat: installe
>    Automatiquement installe: non
>    Version : 2.6.25-3
>    Priorite : optionnel
>    Section : admin
>    Responsable : Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
>    Taille decompressee : 57,3M
>    Depend: module-init-tools, initramfs-tools (>= 0.55) | yaird (>=
>    0.0.12-25) |
>             linux-initramfs-tool
>    Pre-depend: debconf (>= 0.2.17) | debconf-2.0
>    Recommande: libc6-i686
>    Suggere: linux-doc-2.6.25, grub | lilo
>    Est en conflit: initramfs-tools (< 0.55), yaird (< 0.0.12-25)
>    Fournit: linux-image, linux-image-2.6, linux-modules-2.6.25-2-686
>    Description : Linux 2.6.25 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4
>     This package provides the binary image and pre-built loadable modules for
>    Linux
>     kernel 2.6.25 on Pentium Pro/Celeron/Pentium II/Pentium III/Pentium 4
>    machines.
>    ********************************************
>    Same problem. Boot freezes on :
>    **********
>    Begin : Loading essential drivers
>    done
>    Begin : Running /scripts/init-premount

okay thanks for quick reaction.
thanks also for ruling out 686 false cpu detection due to 486 testing.

currenly the best guess is that udev is loading one driver that
makes your box freeze.

so please  change in /etc/udev/udev.conf the log priority
udev_log="info" and then update initramfs
update-initramfs -u -k <kernelversion>

where kernelversion is the desired uname -r output in that case
2.6.25-2-686

make sure to rechange the udev_log afterwards to err, as this
slows down boot..

what are the last shown messages before freeze?





Reply to: