Re: Question about "time indices" during boot process with new (>= 2.6.25) kernel images

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Question about "time indices" during boot process with new (>= 2.6.25) kernel images
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:53:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 48327574.6060900@debian.org>
Reply-to: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080519173153.GC10412@colo.lackof.org>
References: <[🔎] 482D419D.2080301@leat.rub.de> <[🔎] 482E95C9.6040608@debian.org> <[🔎] 20080519173153.GC10412@colo.lackof.org>

dann frazier wrote:
> This change was announced here:
>  http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/03/msg00265.html
> 
> So I believe it was intentional.

ah, missed that one, thanks.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Reply to:

References:
- Question about "time indices" during boot process with new (>= 2.6.25) kernel images
  - From: Fabian Greffrath <greffrath@leat.rub.de>
- Re: Question about "time indices" during boot process with new (>= 2.6.25) kernel images
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
- Re: Question about "time indices" during boot process with new (>= 2.6.25) kernel images
  - From: dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#482007: redhat-cluster_2.20080229-1.1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc, error: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function
Next by Date: Bug#444981: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Oops in free_uid()
Previous by thread: Re: Question about "time indices" during boot process with new (>= 2.6.25) kernel images
Next by thread: Processed: bug still seems to be present, so it should stay open, even if you tag it as wont-fix.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread