Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.24-5
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:50:42PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.24-5 tomorrow.
> i think it is a bit too fast:
I don't know if its the *best* timing (for the reasons you state), but
it would let us get a 2.6.24-4-based etchnhalf upload done sooner -
which is a good thing, and seems to be one of the driving reasons
waldi is suggesting it:
* h01ger thinks a etchnhalf testkernel should just be released, for
<waldi> no, it is not supposed to be in lenny
<h01ger> testing as the act of testing. not that name..
<waldi> err, yep
<waldi> will take it over as dannf did not even the proposed merge
<waldi> but needs a linux-2.6 upload first
fwiw, I was waiting for a 2.6.24-5 to do the above mentioned merge,
but there's obviously no harm in doing it sooner. And I also agree
that we need to upload to stable soon after 2.6.24-5 gets uploaded
(and probably within a day or so of each 2.6.24 sid upload).
> * gdth unfixed
> * CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES vs. atd
Anyone object to disabling this for etchnhalf?
> * huge stable-queu for 126.96.36.199 (without deadline yet although)
> ~/src/stable-queue$ ls -1 queue-2.6.24/ | wc -l