[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#437344: seemingly random SATA disk lockup with ICH5: amazing way to ask for more info on the BTS



>> Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686
>> Version: 2.6.21-6
>> Severity: important
>
>stopped reading at that point, there is newer linux images
>in the archive install them directly from unstable.

Amazing.
Tell me, are your trying to turn debian support/BTS into a joke?

If one need to run the brand new latest über-unstable version of the kernel to 
have a chance to get his bug report *read*, why do even reportbug accept to 
submit bugs reports against older versions?

I find really astonishing to get such reply to a bug report about a not so 
trivial bug in a not so trivial piece of software while running Debian 
GNU/Linux.

Indeed, if you are not even polite enough to read more than 3 words in a bug 
report, clearly you do not need/deserve more help to improve Debian. Do not 
expect "more info" any time soon.

Not really sure it is in the best interest of Debian.


CCed to debian-devel because I'm wondering if this way of handling bug reports 
(not reading more than 3 words of the reports and then asking for more info 
and asking to install unstable software) is endorsed by debian developers 
nowadays.



-- 
Mathieu Roy

  | Not everybody on earth is native english speaker, keep cool :)
  | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english




Reply to: