also sprach Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> [2007.07.21.1131 +0200]:
> I'm tempted to reopen this bug report.
> Manually adding the rootdelay parameter is all very nice as a workaround
> for this issue, but is it really an adequate solution?
>
> How can we expect users to know that such an option is required?
>
> How can we make sure in the installer that a first boot does not fail if a
> user does a RAID install?
> Adding "rootdelay=x" by default for all mdadm (and crypto, and lvm?)
> installs does not seem like an attractive option.
>
> There must surely be better ways to deal with this issue?
Probably, I'd love the hear one or even a patch! Since I have no
setup in which to confirm the bug, I'll have a hard time creating
a fix.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"licht wird alles, was ich fasse"
- friedrich nietzsche
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)