Hi Maximilian, I'm sorry I don't understand what you want to tell me. owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > a bug report is not a support request, But this bug was a request to provide proper documentation. I even offered to write it IIRC, if only someone helped me to find the necessary information. > if using the linux-headers and linux-support infrastructure > please holler on debian-kernel. Why should I? I was using kernel-package, and its maintainer reassigned the bug to kernel-headers. If you think this package or its successors are not responsible for the fact that kernel-package documentation and kernel-headers behavior do not match, please reassign the bug to the package you think is responsible, instead of closing it. > for kernel-package question please direct them directly to Manoj, > we do not maintain it. Then why don't you reassign the bug back, or speak to Manoj yourself? I don't know anything about the issue except that it (kernel-headers) doesn't work as advertised (by kernel-package), so I cannot argue with him. You probably can. > so closing for good now this one as kernel-headers are gone! Now that sounds like a bad reason to close a bug. There's probably still some package which installs kernel headers, isn't it? > irc this is even a dup. In which case you should have merged it, not closed. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Attachment:
pgp_lHYhwVrHU.pgp
Description: PGP signature