[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#284059: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.8: Kernel fails to recognize and mount SMB units)



Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:14:26 +0100
with message-id <20071127231426.GI14432@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line kernel-image-2.6.8: Kernel fails to recognize and mount SMB units
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8
Version: ryt1.0
Severity: normal

After Compiling and using kernel 2.6.8 can't mount SMB partitions nor
net SMB shares.
kernel debugs I/O fail...

The same occours with kernel-2.4.27.

With 2.4.22 (my old kernel) there is no problem.

All kernels was compiled for Athlon: 2.4.22 and 2.4.27 with the "same"
options. (importing 2.4.22 config)

Method for compile: make-kpkg

Looking in kernel.org, smbfs changes was made after 2.4.25...

Kernel 2.6.7 compiled with same options works correctly.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to es_ES@euro)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.8 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils]         5.2.1-2    The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils                     5.2.1-2    The GNU file management utilities 

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
smbfs is deprecated and unmaintained since long,
please use cifs.

thus closing

-- 
maks



--- End Message ---

Reply to: