[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#449272: Alternative (buggy, incomplete) firewire stack shipped instead of the stable one



Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
> 2007/11/4, maximilian attems <max@stro.at <mailto:max@stro.at>>:
>
>     On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 02:32:46PM -0200, Alexandre Pereira Nunes
>     wrote:
>     > Debian choose to ship the alternative firewire stack on recent
>     kernels.
>     > Firewire maintainers are not recommending this (see
>     > http://wiki.linux1394.org/JujuMigration) yet, since this new
>     firewire stack
>     > is incomplete. For instance, I can't do ethernet over firewire
>     with 2.6.22,
>     > I have to go back to 2.6.18, which gives me other kind of trouble.
>
>     the switch has been made some time ago.
>     you are the *first* to holler due to ethernet over firewire!
>

Err. No. Not the first.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2007/10/msg00414.html


And I'll note that no one replied. Is the Debian-kernel list not the
right place to discuss the... Debian Kernel?

>     please report bug upstream on bugzilla.kernel.org
>     <http://bugzilla.kernel.org> and let us know your
>     bug nr, see bottom of page
>     http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelReportingBugs
>
>
>
> What are you talking about?
<snip>
I agree with Alexandre. Not a kernel bug; Juju is a DEVELOPMENT UNSTABLE
stack. (Though I see from the kernel build that even further patches
have been applied to the current SVN so maybe thats not so broken,
however that is NOT in unstable/testing...).

  JEB

-- 
  James Bromberger | www.james.rcpt.to | james_AT_rcpt.to
  UK Cell: +44 7952042920 <http://www.snapanumber.com/> | Perth/Au phone in London/UK: +61 8 6424 8325 <http://www.snapanumber.com/>

begin:vcard
fn:James Bromberger
n:Bromberger;James
adr:;;;London;Greater London;;United Kingdom
email;internet:james@rcpt.to
tel;cell:+447952042920
note:GPG: 3F2C F8FD B2D5 AA35 C81A  F914 A5F2 7028 0917 A9E4
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.james.rcpt.to
version:2.1
end:vcard


Reply to: