Re: Reorganizing packages
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
>> > want to track separately this would have to be reverted,
>
>> No. We never had complete support for more than one branch. And I really
>> doubt that anyone wants the sarge-maintenance-problem back.
>
> No, I'm sure we don't want it; but if upstream ever changes its mind later
> about 2.6 being the one true kernel, we might still have it.
I agree with you Steve and personally I don't see any good reason for
dropping it.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: