[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Reorganizing packages

Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
>> > want to track separately this would have to be reverted,
>> No. We never had complete support for more than one branch. And I really
>> doubt that anyone wants the sarge-maintenance-problem back.
> No, I'm sure we don't want it; but if upstream ever changes its mind later
> about 2.6 being the one true kernel, we might still have it.

I agree with you Steve and personally I don't see any good reason for
dropping it.

        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Reply to: