[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#346345: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.15: radeonfb has inverted frequencies for core/memory?)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2007 16:11:48 +0200
with message-id <20070804141148.GA31810@stro.at>
and subject line linux-source-2.6.15: radeonfb has inverted frequencies for core/memory?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-source-2.6.15
Version: 2.6.15-1
Severity: minor


I have a radeon M9 in my thinkpad T41 and both rovclock (radeon
overclock) and fglrx (when I tried it) reported that the memory speed is
200 MHz and core speed is 252 MHz, while in radeonfb during boot reports
the opposite (core is 200 and memory is 252). Af far as I can tell there
is no apparent problem, but I don't use the frame buffer for X.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.15 depends on:
ii  binutils             2.16.1cvs20051214-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2                1.0.2-11            high-quality block-sorting file co

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.15 recommends:
ii  gcc                       4:4.0.2-2      The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]      2.3.5-11       GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  make                      3.80+3.81.b4-1 The GNU version of the "make" util

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-2.6

> > The 200Mhz core clock and 252Mhz ram clock sounds fine and logical.

> Indeed, the values are so close after all, that I could read them both
> either way. I guess that's why it took me so long to notice this
> discrepancy.

thus closing as no kernel bug.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: