Bug#425050: initramfs-tools: Ask if we should update all initramfses
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:17:50 +0200
> maximilian attems <max@stro.at> wrote:
>
> > update_initramfs is already settable in /etc/i-t/update-initramfs-conf
>
> So can we now agree on this? If 'update_initramfs = yes' in that config
> file, then a package should run with '-u' with 'all' it should run '-k
> all'.
the proposal is to make it tristate [ all | yes | no ]
with yes staying as default.
david has a good point that update-initramfs should care to
do the job so the postinst of each package has just to throw
an update-initramfs.
> Would you like me to create a patch for the postinst of i-t?
afaik aboves idea has nothing to do with i-t postinst,
but with update-initramfs, if we all agree that aboves
is fine, i'll be happy to make that available for 0.89
sunny greetings
--
maks
Reply to: