Re: 2.6.21
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:24:52AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 May 2007 10:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This does require one more round of kernel new processing anyway for
> > alpha, so I guess my opinion on whether we should have another upload
> > of 2.6.20 depends on how long folks think that NEW processing would
> > take vs. how long getting 2.6.21 into a testing-worthy state will take.
> Has the issue with HPPA for 2.6.20 been solved? I'd guess that would be
> required as well.
Sorry, which issue is this? None of the open RC bugs on linux-2.6 appear to
be about this issue.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to:
- References:
- 2.6.21
- From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
- Re: 2.6.21
- From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
- Re: 2.6.21
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: 2.6.21
- From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>