arm FTBFS for 2.6.20-2

["Gordon Farquharson" <gordonfarquharson@gmail.com>]

Hi All

I uploaded a patch to fix the FTBFS on arm for 2.6.20-2.

Currently, the kernel includes several modules that do not build on
ARM. The first set were marked as broken in
patches/bugfix/arm/disable-broken-config-options.patch. This patch
marks two more modules as broken. For this commit, the patch file name
is patches/bugfix/arm/disable-broken-config-options2.patch. Is there a
consensus way of organizing such patches? The current naming scheme
isn't particularly informative, and each patch file disables several
kernel config options. Would it be better to create a patch file for
each config option that is disabled? That method may make it easier to
revert patches in the future.

Gordon

--
Gordon Farquharson