Bug#410497: sparc32 kernel is too big, fails to boot
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 08:38:23PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 11 February 2007 18:21, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > I think that changing ABI without abiname bump is a more reasonable
> > solution than dropping it completely. Impact would be pretty minor,
> > given the number of people using sparc32.
> Note that this does mean that any packages containing kernel modules
> will/may need rebuilding on sparc.
In practice, this appears limited to loop-aes, d-i, and l-m-e-2.6.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.