On Sunday 11 February 2007 18:21, Jurij Smakov wrote: > I think that changing ABI without abiname bump is a more reasonable > solution than dropping it completely. Impact would be pretty minor, > given the number of people using sparc32. Note that this does mean that any packages containing kernel modules will/may need rebuilding on sparc.
Attachment:
pgprMZ3UqPs22.pgp
Description: PGP signature