Bug#338405: another patch

[maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>]

On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Russell Coker wrote:

> On Sunday 31 December 2006 20:33, maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at> 
> wrote:
<snipp>
> Such things of course will be less likely to be found if there is no easy 
> option of creating an initramfs that uses it.  The last patch that I sent 
> will give no different result unless you set ONLY_BUSYBOX=y, so I can't 
> imagine it causing any problems for anyone.
> 
> The sleep bug is reported as below:
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341403
> 
> Having this code in mkinitramfs makes it more likely that the busybox bugs 
> will get fixed.

ok!
as you agree that the busybox utitilites are not functional ident,
i queue that patch for postetch. there should be enough time to poke
new busybox upstream to merge such patches.

happy new year.
-- 
maks