Hello, On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:23:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and would > only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing. OK. What do you think about another 2.6.17 release through t-p-u then, to fix the ppc issue in testing? does it make sense at all, considering the current planning (RC1, 2.6.18)? > Personally I'd say the new 2.6.18 needs at least the normal period for > testing in unstable given the number of issues in the current version. I agree. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature