Re: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux

To: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>, Debian kernel team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <debian-bts@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:57:28 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1160326648.16383.30.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] handler.s.C.11602985613529.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <20061008090906.GA4868@baikonur.stro.at> <[🔎] handler.s.C.11602985613529.transcript@bugs.debian.org>

Hi (again),

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 02:34 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
> > clone 387331  -2
> Bug#387331: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686-smp
> Bug 387331 cloned as bug 391706.
[...]
> retitle -2 RM: kernel-image-2.4-686-smp -- RoM etch 2.6 only

I realise this particular binary package is mentioned due to a specific
problem with it, but what about the rest of kernel-latest-2.4-i386?
Don't they also need removing, for the same reasons as
kernel-{image,source}2.4.*?

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
  - From: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>

References:
- Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.
Next by Date: Re: Bug#390695: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: weird messages upon loading the CD-ROM driver[1~
Previous by thread: Re: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
Next by thread: Re: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread