Re: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux

To: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>, Debian kernel team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <debian-bts@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:49:42 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1160326182.16383.25.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] handler.s.C.11602985613529.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <20061008090906.GA4868@baikonur.stro.at> <[🔎] handler.s.C.11602985613529.transcript@bugs.debian.org>

# See comments in body
tags 391709 = confirmed
merge 391709 379332
close 391710
close 391711
thanks

Hi,

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 02:34 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
[...]
> > clone 389269 -5
> Bug#389269: kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k: Shouldn't ship with Etch: 2.2 patch, not a release arch
> Bug 389269 cloned as bug 391709.

This is #379332; merging.

[...]
> > retitle -6 RM:  kernel-patch-2.4-bluez  -- RoM etch 2.6 only
[...]
> > retitel -7 RM: kernel-source-2.2.25 -- RoM etch 2.6 only

These have both been removed already a week ago - kernel-patch-bluez as
#386810 and kernel-source-2.2.25 as #383706

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

References:
- Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.
Next by Date: Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.
Previous by thread: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
Next by thread: Re: Processed: rm old 2.4 linux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread