[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#383299: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: 2.6.17-2 XFS error



On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:03:48PM +0200, Fredrik Olofsson wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
> Version: 2.6.17-6
> Severity: important
> 
> After booting the kernel from linux-image-2.6.17-2 2.6.17-6 one of my
> xfs partitions stopped working (the system was idle at the time of the
> error). Dmesg contained the following error:
> 
> Filesystem "hda3": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1150 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.  Caller 0xd0933588
>  <d093542e> xfs_trans_cancel+0x4d/0xd6 [xfs]  <d0933588> xfs_rename+0xa23/0xacf [xfs]
>  <d0933588> xfs_rename+0xa23/0xacf [xfs]  <d094590d> xfs_vn_rename+0x24/0x64 [xfs]
>  <d0924fed> xfs_iaccess+0x7c/0x146 [xfs]  <d093a876> xfs_access+0x34/0x3a [xfs]
>  <d094594d> xfs_vn_permission+0x0/0x13 [xfs]  <d094595c> xfs_vn_permission+0xf/0x13 [xfs]
>  <b0142a17> kstrdup+0x23/0x42  <b015e819> vfs_rename+0x29c/0x3dc
>  <b015eb5e> __lookup_hash+0x4a/0xc5  <b0160213> sys_renameat+0x155/0x1b9
>  <b0160288> sys_rename+0x11/0x15  <b0102ae7> sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
> xfs_force_shutdown(hda3,0x8) called from line 1151 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.  Return address = 0xd0948200
> Filesystem "hda3": Corruption of in-memory data detected.  Shutting down filesystem: hda3
> Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
> 
> This computer has shown no problems for a long before booting this
> kernel. The computer contains a 1.7GHz P4 and 512MB memory. Also, I had
> the nvidia kernel module loaded..
> 
> After rebooting to linux-image-2.6.17-1 2.6.17-5 the filesystem seems to
> work with no problems again.

Frederik,
  I see nothing in 2.6.17-6 that looks like it could reasonably cause
this - but there was an XFS corruption bug that was fixed in
2.6.17-5. Did you ever mount this fs with an earlier 2.6.17 kernel?

I would suggest forcing a run of xfs_repair on your fs, and retrying
2.6.17-6. Please let us know how that works for you.

-- 
dann frazier




Reply to: