Re: new x86 flavours: -bigmem | -lowlat?
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > -lowlat with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y and CONFIG_HZ=1000 seems more controversial
> > although i could imagine plenty of happy user of it.
> > we might just add in the desc "may trigger strange bugs".
> > the positive flip side is lots of less skips on
> > multimedia apps like lastfm, totem, ..
>
> Really? I'm a heavy user of DVB hardware and video output and don't need
> preemption.
on good hardware yes.
as nobody else spoke for lowmem,
i won't consider it for inclusion.
regards
--
maks
Reply to: