On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 02:10:44AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > That "other stuff" is what I'm interested in, at this point; waldi > claims to be working on stuff[0]. Waldi, can you please expand upon > that? It works properly for linux-nonfree-2.6. For further informations please take a look at <20060108140134.GA18747@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>. Known problems: - modules may want to have its one version and the software currently relays on our versions. - The linux-headers-UPSTREAMVERSION-ABINAME-ARCH provides needs to be changed as it may clash with real packages. I think linux-headers-UPSTREAMVERSION-ABINAME-all-ARCH should be okay. > It would be nice to automate binary module package creation when > a new kernel is released. The last I heard, this was planned by making > the buildds automatically rebuild packages. You have to do source uploads anyway. > If that is the case, who > will be handling the source packages for those binary module packages? My proposal was: - Binary packages with modules sources are maintained by whoever wants it. - Binary modules packages are maintained exclusive by the kernel or another team. Bastian -- No one may kill a man. Not for any purpose. It cannot be condoned. -- Kirk, "Spock's Brain", stardate 5431.6
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature