[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#345067: [Yaird-devel] Re: Bug#345067: ide-generic on poweprc

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:38:55PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sven Luther writes ("Bug#345067: [Yaird-devel] Re: Bug#345067: ide-generic on poweprc"):
> > [ a mixture of technical comments and egregious ranting ]
> Sven, I am very disappointed that even after we have repeatedly asked
> you, in public and in private, to keep your comments civil and
> technical you're failing to do so.
> I'm not willing to read any more of this kind of stuff from you.
> If you can't discuss the _technical questions_ and answer Jonas's
> _technical points_ without insulting him or engaging in other kinds of

That is the real problem. Please point me to a single technical point jonas
has made ? There is no such thing, only non-backed FUD.

> personal attacks then there is no point in us considering your
> complaint.

I passed maybe 4 hours yesterday going over the actual code, and provide real
technical information about why there is no fundation in jonas claim.
Furthermore Jurij confirmed this with his own analysis, and what did jonas do,
accept his error, no, he got arround with more FUD, and then i see aj's post
mentioning how it seems that jonas has things in grip and there is no real
issue anymore.

Really, please look at what jonas has said, and if you find a single technical
point upto now, i will strongly apologize and reconsider my words, but upto
this point, i don't understand how jonas could have become a DD, and fooled
the task-and-skill test.

Again, i have tried to be civil with Jonas again this morning, and we where
having a real discussion on the subject on #debian-kernel, but then, wlam, he
comes again with a load of bullshit you guys deam to be "_technical points_".

> If we were voting today I would consider dismissing your complaint
> with a formal reprimand for your behaviour.

Yeah, but jonas is all fine, thanks very much. I really don't know how low
debian has fallen, and am severly disapointed with the technical comittee.

Sven Luther

Reply to: