Bug#352780: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp: dependence on udev
On Tuesday 07 March, 2006 ? 11:09:48AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:49:34AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:36:37 +0100
> > Sven Luther <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:56:03AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > Please also note that the above comment is from a single member of
> > > > the kernel team, not the kernel team in general. A single member
> > > > who happen to be bitten by a single specific unsolved bug, for
> > > > which the yaird maintainer (me) has refused to apply a workaround
> > > > provided by him.
> > > please fix #345067, it has a patch, and there is no sane reason
> > > > Really, Sven. Please do not contaminate unrelated bugreports with
> > > > your personal frustration over yaird!
> > >
> > > Well, i am frustrated, but seriously, do you consider that yaird is
> > > currently well maintained given the above situation ? I don't,
> > So all in all (ignoring the comments irrelevant to this bugreport) you
> > agree with my statement. Thanks for the confirmation.
> And you do agree that you are doing a piss-poor job of maintaining yaird,
> thanks for the confirmation, and now, what do you plan to do about it ?
> Anyway, i have, as you asked me in Erkelenz, escalated #345067 to the
> technical comitte, which only shows that you are unable to even look at a 3
> line patch.
> Too bad, like said, i liked yaird better than initramfs-tools, too bad you are
> sabotaging it.
> Sven Luther
Yaird works perfectly fine on all our servers. The only time i tried
initramfs-tools, my raid5 were messed up. it was a very serious issue
for us. maybe it's a coincidence but i don't want to mess with