On Friday 10 February 2006 21:33, Sven Luther wrote: > > Well, and let one vulnerable remote security update open for a day > > more, this is not acceptable. Even if only one user gets compromised > > because of this, then it is enough to warrant the upload. Please read what I said. I did not say that uploading -5 was not correct. I said that -5 should have been allowed to migrate to testing _before_ -6 was uploaded! > Err, i was going to say that the urgency is anyway not so important, as > the RMs can always hint it in before time if needed. Which is not an excuse for maintainers hurrying uploads without thinking things through properly.
Description: PGP signature