Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?

To: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: 334104@bugs.debian.org, Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
Subject: Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:46:08 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060111134608.GA5092@wonderland.linux.it>
Reply-to: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri), 334104@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060111134324.GA9244@localhost.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 20060111130033.GA8451@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 20060111133518.GA4886@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 20060111134324.GA9244@localhost.localdomain>

On Jan 11, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> So you think that these two cards : 
I remember that some card(s) work with one driver but not the other, and
IIRC they have the same PCI ID.
There was some old hotplug bug about this.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
Next by Date: Re: Bug#346281: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: debconf question about /lib/modules/2.6.15-1-686 even if no kernel is installed
Previous by thread: Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
Next by thread: Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread