Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?

To: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>, 334104@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:00:33 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060111130033.GA8451@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>, 334104@bugs.debian.org

Hi Jurij, ...

Any idea why this patch was not applied to our kernel and forwarded upstream ?
It seems to fix the issue, but there where no news about this bug report since
November ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)

Prev by Date: Bug#287867: Can you confirm this bug please ?
Next by Date: Bug#347186: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: Bug#347186: linux-image-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: garbled Matrox framebuffer
Previous by thread: Bug#299014: Hi Pavel, ... is this patch still valid, or was it integrated upstream ?
Next by thread: Bug#334104: Why was this patch not applied ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread