Re: Bug#346281: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: debconf question about /lib/modules/2.6.15-1-686 even if no kernel is installed
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:56:10AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:53:03 +0100
> Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:25 +0100, Sven Luther
> > > <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> said:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:33:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > >> reassign 346281 linux-2.6 thanks
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> If you have decided that putting the build link in headers is
> > > >> correct, then you get to fix this. The kernel-package tool does
> > > >> it dofferently, and while you are not required to follow what k-p
> > > >> does, any non-standard and unsupported changes you make to the
> > > >> way k-p works is your responsibility to fix.
> > >
> > > > Whatever, i think the build directory should just work, and that
> > > > was the agreement we had back then on this. I assumed this was
> > > > indeed the case. Any idea what exactly is going wrong here.
> > >
> > > Define "just work". And the agreement I recall was codified
> > > on http://wiki.debian.org/KernelModulesPackaging
> >
> > Jonas and you wrote that one unilaterally despite my protests, i don't
> > recognize that document. And since jonas seems to be kind-of MIA
> > since a couple of weeks, this leaves only you.
>
> I am alive and well. Just tired of discussing with you, Sven.
Well, this was the impression i got from the lack of new yaird upload, but
hey, nice to see you around.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: