Re: Bug#346281: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: debconf question about /lib/modules/2.6.15-1-686 even if no kernel is installed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:53:03 +0100
Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:25 +0100, Sven Luther
> > <email@example.com> said:
> > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:33:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > >> reassign 346281 linux-2.6 thanks
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> If you have decided that putting the build link in headers is
> > >> correct, then you get to fix this. The kernel-package tool does
> > >> it dofferently, and while you are not required to follow what k-p
> > >> does, any non-standard and unsupported changes you make to the
> > >> way k-p works is your responsibility to fix.
> > > Whatever, i think the build directory should just work, and that
> > > was the agreement we had back then on this. I assumed this was
> > > indeed the case. Any idea what exactly is going wrong here.
> > Define "just work". And the agreement I recall was codified
> > on http://wiki.debian.org/KernelModulesPackaging
> Jonas and you wrote that one unilaterally despite my protests, i don't
> recognize that document. And since jonas seems to be kind-of MIA
> since a couple of weeks, this leaves only you.
I am alive and well. Just tired of discussing with you, Sven.
I am following this thread closely, and adding input only when needed -
as I do now.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----