Frans Pop wrote: > Also, using 2.6.12/14/15 in Sarge (volatile) IMO means that the kernel > team will need to commit to maintaining that version with regard to > security updates, just as for 2.6.8. > Continuously making the latest kernel available for Sarge through volatile > IMO is not an option, unless maybe done through a separate repository > kernel-volatile with all due warnings of "use at your own risk" attached. Including whatever kernel is in testing might work, hopefully that kernel would not have major development bugs and we[1] still have to support it for security. -- see shy jo [1] secure-testing
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature