On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:25:47PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > > Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail: > > > > m68k > > No abiname; not updated. ? > > > > [This is another arch that I'd consider releasing d-i rc3 without > > it being updated for the kernel security fixes.] > > So s390 and hppa are the main potential rc3 blockers, while alpha and > > sparc just need to get kernels into testing and arm, m68k, and powerpc > > (2.4) need to get a move on if you want them updated for the rc3 > > release. We're fast approaching the point where the kernel updates are > > the only significant thing blocking the rc3 release. > > Note that besides the abiname changes, there are pending uploads for > > both 2.4 and 2.6, for all arches, to fix numerous other security holes. > > I'm not considering those above, since it should be much easier to roll > > a fix for a "normal" kernel security hole into d-i than the it is for > > these security fixes that involve ABI changes. > I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make it > urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old Since this is a security fix, I've bumped the urgency to let this package in with tonight's run. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature