Re: preparing 2.6.10
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:19:10AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:42:48 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> [...]
> >> The IRQ-after-swsusp-awakening patch (attached). Needed to make
> >> some hardware drivers work after resuming from swsusp (Source:
> >> Message-ID: <20050103150505.GA4120@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net>)
> >>
> >> The swsusp-speedup-patch (attached) - makes the swsusp in kernel a lot
> >> faster on suspending (source:
> >> Message-ID: <20041225175453.GA10222@elf.ucw.cz>)
> >
> > We don't ship with swsusp enabled so this is just a waste of time.
>
> I think enough people have been asking for swsusp that it may be worth
> trying to enable it again, and seeing how/if it breaks for people. I
> wouldn't want to do it for 2.6.10-1, though; rather, let's get 2.6.10-1
> out there, and if that proves stable, we can start doing some more
> experimental stuff w/ 2.6.10-2.
>
> Ditto for the misrouted-irq patch.
I personally have been using swsup to good effect with 2.6.10-rc1 and rc2.
--
Horms -> 2c worth
Reply to: