Re: 2.6.14 status summary, and upcoming 2.6.15 ...
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:04:59AM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > currently waiting for a patch from svenl to build against
> > linux-kernel-headers, status?
> Nope, sorry, i had no real time to investigate this more than i did, and my
> tests didn't work out because of the asm-powerpc symlink farm breakage.
ok fine so it was good to fix that :)
> I believe that l-k-h needs to be setup to use another newer kernel headers, or
> better yet use the same kernel libc project headers as ubuntu uses, altough
> jbailey reported having build klibs with and older kernels (2.6.12 or
> something such). not sure what influence the pure64 patch from Andreas Jochens
> has on this, but i guess it confuses the issue more.
> My own testing where hurt by the ARCH=powerpc header migration, which is now
> fixed in 2.6.14-4, and i only need to find time for it again.
jbaley mentioned needing to fix linux-kernel-headers.
so in the meantime i would be happy if we could reintroduce that
asm symlink. need to talk with waldi, didn't reach him today.